<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7: Too Many Choices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/</link>
	<description>Technology For Us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 04:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: theconsciouslife</title>
		<link>http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>theconsciouslife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astro-geek.com/?p=336#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t agree more. If not for the fact that the applications I used are not available on the Mac, I&#039;d have move to OS X long time ago. MS just don&#039;t seem to get it, sad to say, even after what has happened to Vista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t agree more. If not for the fact that the applications I used are not available on the Mac, I&#8217;d have move to OS X long time ago. MS just don&#8217;t seem to get it, sad to say, even after what has happened to Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fishbulb42</title>
		<link>http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>fishbulb42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astro-geek.com/?p=336#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Windows Vista actually had a Starter edition they mentioned in passing way back when it was first being released, but you never see it listed with the others. Had to dig up a Wikipedia article to be certain I wasn&#039;t imagining it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_editions

I&#039;m surprised in checking on this to also find out that XP had a Starter edition. Never heard a thing about that one. Hopefully they have the same plans with the new version, and we won&#039;t have to worry about people grabbing it by mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Vista actually had a Starter edition they mentioned in passing way back when it was first being released, but you never see it listed with the others. Had to dig up a Wikipedia article to be certain I wasn&#8217;t imagining it. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_editions" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_editions</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised in checking on this to also find out that XP had a Starter edition. Never heard a thing about that one. Hopefully they have the same plans with the new version, and we won&#8217;t have to worry about people grabbing it by mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astro-geek.com/?p=336#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I have to agree. Having 6 flavors to choose from will be awful. I downloaded the iso file and have it installed on my macbook via VirtualBox by Sun. I allocated only 640MB of RAM for it, and it seems pretty snappy. I had it on my wife&#039;s HP before HP sent me the Restore DVDs (that&#039;s another story). Her system has 4GB of RAM and it ran great! The OS seems pretty polished already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree. Having 6 flavors to choose from will be awful. I downloaded the iso file and have it installed on my macbook via VirtualBox by Sun. I allocated only 640MB of RAM for it, and it seems pretty snappy. I had it on my wife&#8217;s HP before HP sent me the Restore DVDs (that&#8217;s another story). Her system has 4GB of RAM and it ran great! The OS seems pretty polished already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astro-geek.com/?p=336#comment-79</guid>
		<description>@Mike - The only thing I can think of for the Starter version is maybe netbooks or older machines that might not have the processing power or memory to handle more than 3 apps anyway?  Other than that.... *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike &#8211; The only thing I can think of for the Starter version is maybe netbooks or older machines that might not have the processing power or memory to handle more than 3 apps anyway?  Other than that&#8230;. *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Steinhilber</title>
		<link>http://www.astro-geek.com/2009/02/windows-7-too-many-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Steinhilber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astro-geek.com/?p=336#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you Christopher, it is completely stupid.  I spent a significant part of my career managing a computer chain and I can see big problems here.  First, you are correct, people don&#039;t want to have to worry about what choice to make for an OS - especially not having to select from one of 6.  The big problem I see is poorly performing salespeople not adequately informing the customer about which version offers what features.  As a result, I see users purchasing a PC and expecting it to perform X, Y, and Z.  They get it home, and days or perhaps months later learn it can only do X and Y but Z will be available through an anytime upgrade program (assuming Microsoft offers this with Windows 7 as they did Vista) for an additional $150.  I too thought a two version approach (home and business) would have been more ideal if they were to split it up.  I certainly dislike the Windows 7 Starter version - 3 concurrent apps... what are you thinking!  I certainly hope that this version is limited to special purpose PC platforms, and not actively sold - I see big problems stemming from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you Christopher, it is completely stupid.  I spent a significant part of my career managing a computer chain and I can see big problems here.  First, you are correct, people don&#8217;t want to have to worry about what choice to make for an OS &#8211; especially not having to select from one of 6.  The big problem I see is poorly performing salespeople not adequately informing the customer about which version offers what features.  As a result, I see users purchasing a PC and expecting it to perform X, Y, and Z.  They get it home, and days or perhaps months later learn it can only do X and Y but Z will be available through an anytime upgrade program (assuming Microsoft offers this with Windows 7 as they did Vista) for an additional $150.  I too thought a two version approach (home and business) would have been more ideal if they were to split it up.  I certainly dislike the Windows 7 Starter version &#8211; 3 concurrent apps&#8230; what are you thinking!  I certainly hope that this version is limited to special purpose PC platforms, and not actively sold &#8211; I see big problems stemming from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
